It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 11:39 pm

All times are UTC





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 151 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:54 pm 
Offline
MCAD Expert
User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Posts: 1439
Country: United States
State: Florida
CAD System: Inventor
RonC wrote:
Especially when there are other books with conflicting accounts.


Specifically?

RonC wrote:

I do not believe that if a god created us, that he expects us to worship him and devote our lives to him, only to live our lives and enjoy life. Expecting us to worship him would be a personality flaw.


Who said He does? (If) He created us with Free will, (then) so it is our choice, and He prefers that we have a relationship with him, like any Father would with his son. Do you consider it a personality flaw if any memeber of this forum expects his son to have a decent relationship wiht him, and be thankful for what he as a father provides (i'd use myself, but as yet have no children-just two cats)

_________________
Swim - Bike - Run ...Repeat
@BreakingChad
The Company Website


Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on DiggShare on DeliciousShare on TumblrShare on Google+
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 5:00 am 
Offline
MCAD Regular

Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 243
SeanDotson wrote:
If you want to quote scriptures then you have to consider that Adam lived to be 800 (Gen 5:4). By that account he could have (and did, see also 5:4) father MANY other children. One of these children or their children could have married Cain.

I am one to believe that the Bible needs to be taken literally in some places and figuratively in others.

Example, I do not believe that a flood came and killed EVERYTHING on the earth. I do not believe that Noah put 2 of EVERY creature on a boat. If you take the dimensions of the ark from the Bible it's simply not large enough.

However I do believe that perhaps there was Noah who put a LOT of animals on a boat and survived a local flood.

This is known as allegory. A way to make a point by giving a "embellished" story to convey the meaning. I think that much of the old testament is full of allegory.

Again so many people see thins as white or black. You have to believe 100% one way or the other. I disagree. I believe that there is a middle ground.

And by the way, no need to feel sorry for me and my faith. We're perfectly fine.



I think i heard someone say something like "Lucky for religion the almighty can do anything he wants and when the word of god is shown to be flawed, they just come out with 'that

_________________
I started out with nothing and still have most of it left.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:02 pm 
Offline
MCAD Regular

Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 486
Country: Canada
State: Manitoba
CAD System: Inventor
SeanDotson wrote:
The other topic got me going again. There are so many people who argue either one or the other side of this must be true with no middle ground. So why can't both be true?

I'm a person of faith and of science. They don't have to be mutually exclusive. Why could not evolution be a part of a plan put in place by a higher power? There is a lot of science to back up evolution. Much of it I believe. However that does not mean there was not a creator either.

Why does it have to be black or white? Discuss...


I honestly believe that both Creation and Evolution are simply a faith, a belief. Neither can be proven because how can you possible prove that there is a God other then to see his works and say "by faith I know that this is the act of God". The same is said for evolution, I was not there, i can not say something did or did not happen. Some things happened some time in the past that science can not explain, and they make a ton of assumptions to fill in the holes in the entire theory of evolution.

I believe that we evolve as well as plants and animals. So in other words, if you bread a dog up north were it is cold, it will start to have offspring with a heavier coat of fat and fur. But I don't believe that a dog will over billions of years turn into a bird and fly south for the winter to get away from the cold. That is the essence of evolution, something turning into something that it is not. A puddle of water with some stuff floating around in it for millions of years turning into something that is alive.

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=eL-cORRZdng

If you really want to see what I mean click on the link to a video that is a great debate on the subject from a man by the name of Kent Hovind. It is a bit long, but if you really want to see why it is so black or white this is a great video to show you exactly why. I for one believe in Creation for the very reasons that Kent describes in that debate.

Edit: If you don't want to watch the whole thing, Kent starts his presentation at 27:30, and it lasts for about 20 minutes.

_________________
Ed Wiebe
www.convey-all.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:49 pm 
Offline
MCAD Expert
User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Posts: 1439
Country: United States
State: Florida
CAD System: Inventor
slick006 wrote:
I believe that we evolve as well as plants and animals. So in other words, if you bread a dog up north were it is cold, it will start to have offspring with a heavier coat of fat and fur.


This is scientifically not sound. the environment has no effect on our genetics per se (with the exception of heavy radiation, which is typically a negative effect). Cold weather does not cause something to evolve with a thicker coat, rather, the animal with the genetic trait that allows for a thicker coat, survives longer in the cold thus allowign survival (of the fittest perhaps) passing on the trait to the next generation.

side note: I believe this 100% on the micor scale...but you are right...not on a macro scale, Slick006. I have often wondered how a bumble bee could evolve-or rather, why would something evolve into something so aerodynmaically unsound as a bumble bee?

_________________
Swim - Bike - Run ...Repeat
@BreakingChad
The Company Website


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:58 pm 
Offline
Forum Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jan 2004
Posts: 4020
Country: United States
State: California
CAD System: Inventor
slick006 wrote:
I honestly believe that both Creation and Evolution are simply a faith, a belief. Neither can be proven because how can you possible prove that there is a God other then to see his works and say "by faith I know that this is the act of God".


Evolution has never been "Proven". Evolution is a Theory based on the scientific method.

Creation is not a Theory, it's based on Belief.

What Hovind and other Creationist "Scientist" want others to believe is that Creation is also a Theory of equal validity to Evolution, but it just does not hold up to scientific scrutiny.

Quote:
Kent E. Hovind (born January 15, 1953) is an American Young Earth creationist and conspiracy theorist currently serving time in federal prison for tax-related crimes.

Hovind also has no education from accredited universities. In short, he's a quack and a snake oil salesman.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hovind

_________________
Ron
http://www.arken.net Engineering and Design
http://www.arkenstudios.com Professional Photography


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:26 am 
Offline
MCAD Regular

Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 486
Country: Canada
State: Manitoba
CAD System: Inventor
RonC wrote:
slick006 wrote:
I honestly believe that both Creation and Evolution are simply a faith, a belief. Neither can be proven because how can you possible prove that there is a God other then to see his works and say "by faith I know that this is the act of God".


Evolution has never been "Proven". Evolution is a Theory based on the scientific method.

Creation is not a Theory, it's based on Belief.

What Hovind and other Creationist "Scientist" want others to believe is that Creation is also a Theory of equal validity to Evolution, but it just does not hold up to scientific scrutiny.

Quote:
Kent E. Hovind (born January 15, 1953) is an American Young Earth creationist and conspiracy theorist currently serving time in federal prison for tax-related crimes.

Hovind also has no education from accredited universities. In short, he's a quack and a snake oil salesman.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hovind


The fact that he does not have education from any "accredited universities" does not make him less intelligent does it? Does it mean that all of what he says is false, or a lie? No it doesn't, there are many intelligent people that did not go to these "accredited universities". Not sure what him going to jail has to do with anything? Does that also make him less intelligent? Lots of people don't pay their taxes and go to jail for it.

I'm not saying this guy is correct in all his thinking and I agree that the man is very one sided and extreme in his views, but some of his statements are still true, based on facts.

The fact is that Sean asked why is it so black and White, and i think this is why. Because of people like me, that can not wrap my head around the idea that a puddle of water with stuff in it became alive. Some of that puddle turned into fish and some turned into monkeys while other parts of it made plants. I have never seen or heard of any scientist making something that was not alive, become alive. I like to know why things are the way they are most of the time, but this is one area where I don't know that anyone can convince me 100% truth. Like I said I do believe in some points of evolution, just not to the point that something can come from a bunch of nothing and that nothing can make all that you see around me. That may be my ignorance showing, or my faith coming through, but for me, it is pretty black and white.

_________________
Ed Wiebe
www.convey-all.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:51 am 
Offline
MCAD Regular

Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 243
slick006 wrote:
.... I for one believe in Creation for the very reasons that Kent describes in that debate.


I'll admit I didn't watch the video but I did you read about this guy and his theories. If you hadn't read them and you do, can you tell me if you are still so keen on what he says? If you had and you still think the same as him, best of luck to you, no need to respond.

AltechChad wrote:
the environment has no effect on our genetics per se


Sorry but just how was it you 'know' the environment has no effect on genetics over the span of a few thousand years? And that the old environment, before accurately recorded history (not an embellished story), wasn't effecting genetics in a different way from today? I'm not saying it does or did but I would like to know, how you know, it doesn

_________________
I started out with nothing and still have most of it left.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:55 am 
Offline
Forum Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jan 2004
Posts: 4020
Country: United States
State: California
CAD System: Inventor
slick006 wrote:
The fact that he does not have education from any "accredited universities" does not make him less intelligent does it? Does it mean that all of what he says is false, or a lie? No it doesn't, there are many intelligent people that did not go to these "accredited universities".


uhh, first, who said he's "intelligent"?

He has zero education in science. His unaccredited education is in religious education.

Here's a good quote:
Quote:
Having a website called "Dr. Dino," has provoked some academics to closely look at how Hovind presents his education and credentials. Chemistry professor Karen Bartelt has said that it is "very unusual for a person with a Ph.D., even a real one," [emphasis in original] to list oneself in the phonebook as "Dr Hovind", as Hovind has done.


Here's an even better quote:
Quote:
Barbara Forrest, a professor of philosophy, expert on the history of creationism and activist in the Creation-evolution controversy, wrote that Hovind's lack of academic training makes it impossible to engage him on a professional level.


Quote:
Not sure what him going to jail has to do with anything? Does that also make him less intelligent? Lots of people don't pay their taxes and go to jail for it.


Again, Intelligent? He is a thief who stole from you and I by not paying his fair share of taxes. In my book, he's both a thief and a liar and I don't give him one iota of credence in anything he has to say.

Do you overlook his thieving ways just because he's a "good Christian"? I have contempt for him.


Quote:
I'm not saying this guy is correct in all his thinking and I agree that the man is very one sided and extreme in his views, but some of his statements are still true, based on facts.


Care to quote some true facts that he states?

Quote:
The fact is that Sean asked why is it so black and White, and i think this is why. Because of people like me, that can not wrap my head around the idea that a puddle of water with stuff in it became alive. Some of that puddle turned into fish and some turned into monkeys while other parts of it made plants. I have never seen or heard of any scientist making something that was not alive, become alive. I like to know why things are the way they are most of the time, but this is one area where I don't know that anyone can convince me 100% truth. Like I said I do believe in some points of evolution, just not to the point that something can come from a bunch of nothing and that nothing can make all that you see around me. That may be my ignorance showing, or my faith coming through, but for me, it is pretty black and white.


So Magic or Miracles are easier to believe? "A Puddle of water..." is too simplistic, no wonder you can't wrap your head around it.

Again, no-one can convince you 100% of evolution simply because it's a theory, not fact. One theory that can possibly explain how we came to be here. It just so happens to be a theory that has a whole lot of science and history behind it. Besides Evolution, there's Geology - something that doesn't make life - yet the Young Earth people fail to grasp that science also. Geology has a lot more provable science behind it compared to evolution but your "Dr." Hovind tends to rebuff that too.

_________________
Ron
http://www.arken.net Engineering and Design
http://www.arkenstudios.com Professional Photography


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:34 am 
Offline
MCAD Expert

Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 1092
RonC wrote:
So Magic or Miracles are easier to believe? "A Puddle of water..." is too simplistic, no wonder you can't wrap your head around it.

Again, no-one can convince you 100% of evolution simply because it's a theory, not fact. One theory that can possibly explain how we came to be here. It just so happens to be a theory that has a whole lot of science and history behind it. Besides Evolution, there's Geology - something that doesn't make life - yet the Young Earth people fail to grasp that science also. Geology has a lot more provable science behind it compared to evolution but your "Dr." Hovind tends to rebuff that too.


That


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:04 pm 
Offline
Forum Admin
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jan 2004
Posts: 13448
Country: United States
State: Florida
CAD System: Inventor
Steve does make a good point. What was there before the Big Bang? Nothing. So how can nothing turn into something? There is nothing to interact or change to become something.

Even if you put a "higher power" out of the equation you are taking on faith that there was nothing and now something. There is no science to explain it. But you believe it.

In some respects science and faith are not too far apart.

_________________
Sean Dotson, PE
RND Automation & Engineering
Free 30 day trial of iPropWiz v5
Follow @seandotson & @mcadforums & @rndautomationon Twitter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:18 pm 
Offline
MCAD Regular

Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 243
Steve wrote:
Evolution is the biggest house of cards that has ever been stacked and it is the Anti-Christian hammer of our era.


I believe Evolution is opposed to all the Creationist religions, not just the Christians so your not alone.

Steve wrote:
Just because the majority of people have been literally forced, during their formative years, through a Federal Leftist inspired brain washing system that we call education


When you say "literally" do you mean "actually" or "in effect; in substance; very nearly; virtually"....?
If you mean "actually", please, try to give some examples.
Do you know how many people have been "actually" forced, by threat of physical violence and death, to toe the line of just the Christians (don't worry about the atrosities of the other guys)? How many people have been told they will spend an eternity burning in hell if they don't toe the line? How many have been killed just because they were not Christian?

Steve wrote:
There are so many holes in all the theoretical sciences that you can literally pour water through them.


Show us some good ones, some big juicy ones, like you've been shown with the "embellished" bible.

Steve wrote:
It

_________________
I started out with nothing and still have most of it left.


Last edited by Inventor Productions on Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:40 pm 
Offline
MCAD Regular

Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 243
SeanDotson wrote:
Steve does make a good point. What was there before the Big Bang? Nothing. So how can nothing turn into something? There is nothing to interact or change to become something.

Even if you put a "higher power" out of the equation you are taking on faith that there was nothing and now something. There is no science to explain it. But you believe it.
In some respects science and faith are not too far apart.


The point is just as good either way, because really no one "knows" or can "prove beyond all reasonable doubt" S.F.A.!!!

I don't believe period! And I'm content that way. But I do like a good controversy!

You know, when I think about it, I have never met what I would call a bad person at any church and I've been to a few, I do truly believe each to their own (read: what it takes to get you through the day, as long as you don't blow my buzz) but the world we live in isn't really like that.

Keep smiling and all the best to all of you.

Daniel Membry

_________________
I started out with nothing and still have most of it left.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:49 pm 
Offline
Forum Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jan 2004
Posts: 4020
Country: United States
State: California
CAD System: Inventor
SeanDotson wrote:
Steve does make a good point. What was there before the Big Bang? Nothing. So how can nothing turn into something? There is nothing to interact or change to become something.

Even if you put a "higher power" out of the equation you are taking on faith that there was nothing and now something. There is no science to explain it. But you believe it.

In some respects science and faith are not too far apart.


I already stated above that I feel that both Evolution and Creation can co-exist. I have never said that the "Big Bang" theory has to be the only explanation. I don't know how things started and again, "Big Bang", besides being a great TV show, is just a theory - currently the best theory science has to offer - but still a theory. Science, by it's very nature cannot have in it's core a "magic" step.

_________________
Ron
http://www.arken.net Engineering and Design
http://www.arkenstudios.com Professional Photography


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:55 pm 
Offline
MCAD Expert

Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 1092
Inventor Productionsquote="Steve wrote:
There are so many holes in all the theoretical sciences that you can literally pour water through them

Show us some good ones, some big juicy ones, like you've been shown.


Daniel


The Big Bang, that's the biggest juiciest one I can think of and it just happens to be the "current" foundation for evolution.

In the US, the vast majority of children go to federally funded schools. That funding comes with strings, correct that, ropes. The few home schoolers who are out there are constantly under attack and legislation is introduced every year to make them comply with federal standards or to put them out of business. If you don't comply and they find out that you're not the government will take your children and label you as unfit parents.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:00 pm 
Offline
MCAD Expert

Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 1092
RonC wrote:
SeanDotson wrote:
Steve does make a good point. What was there before the Big Bang? Nothing. So how can nothing turn into something? There is nothing to interact or change to become something.

Even if you put a "higher power" out of the equation you are taking on faith that there was nothing and now something. There is no science to explain it. But you believe it.

In some respects science and faith are not too far apart.


I already stated above that I feel that both Evolution and Creation can co-exist. I have never said that the "Big Bang" theory has to be the only explanation. I don't know how things started and again, "Big Bang", besides being a great TV show, is just a theory - currently the best theory science has to offer - but still a theory. Science, by it's very nature cannot have in it's core a "magic" step.


But...but,,,The Big Bang is a magic step. It has no beginning, it just is.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 151 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
POWERED_BY